|
The
philosophy of all Buddhist traditions
supports the idea that the gender differences are not
significant when it comes to spiritual development. Although
the Buddha was initially reluctant
to ordain women as nuns, perhaps
on social or logistical grounds, he affirmed that they
are as capable as men of attaining complete enlightenment.
In the Samyutta Nikaya of the Pali
Tipitaka he further states that anyone "whether
they be women or whether they be men", all can attain
Nirvana if they practice the Dhamma. In the Vimalakirtinirdesa
Sutra, an important Mahayana work, a monk asks a
woman why she does not change her gender, a question reflecting
the belief popular in some Mahayana schools that a woman
should pray to take rebirth as
a man because only then would spiritual development be
possible. The woman replied: "I have been here twelve
years looking for the innate characteristics of femininity
and I have been unable to find them". This answer
is based on the fundamental Buddhist doctrine that all
things are without self-nature.
However,
despite being philosophically gender neutral, the literature
of all Buddhist traditions contain comments that today
continually appear to be misogynistic. Women are described
as being foolish, sensual and prone to jealousy, nagging
and gossip. And sadly, it is such ideas that have tended
to condition attitudes to women in Buddhist societies,
rather than the philosophical aspects of Buddhism. However,
purdha, the impossibility of divorce, female circumcision
and other such practices which have not just disadvantaged
women, but also oppressed them and which have been sanctioned
by other religious traditions, have been absent in Buddhist
societies.
See
also Lives of the Nuns
and Therigatha.
I.B.
Horner, Women Under Primitive Buddhism, New York,
1930;
R.M. Grass, Buddhism After Patriarchy, New York,
1993;
L.S. Deinaraja, The Position of Women in Buddhism,
Kandy, 1981.
|